Zhang, Zohren & Roberts (2019) extend DeepLOB with quantile regression: CNN+LSTM branches predict long/short return quantiles from LOBs, then combine them. Plain-language intro. Not investment advice.
Takeaway. DeepLOB-QR keeps the CNN-on-the-book backbone, then branches LSTMs so one network estimates several return quantiles for long and short sides at once—then a forecast combination of those quantiles can be more robust than a single point.
Extending Deep Learning Models for Limit Order Books to Quantile Regression (Zihao Zhang, Stefan Zohren, Stephen Roberts, 2019; arXiv:1906.04404) is the distributional sequel to DeepLOB.
Fit for learners: DeepLOB + quantiles for distributional mid-price moves — practical uncertainty layer for trading signals.
This Hub note is a plain-language intro. Not investment advice.
A mid-price direction classifier hides spread costs. Intraday long and short returns are not symmetric at the same stamp (you buy the ask and sell the bid). Fat tails mean a point forecast is not a risk picture. Training six separate nets on millions of LSE book events is wasteful if they share the same supply–demand features.
Research template on 2017 LSE names—not a colocated bot.
This is the cleanest reason to learn pinball / quantile loss after MSE: same tensors as DeepLOB, different heads. It also forces you to write long vs short PnL with spreads, which OHLCV notebooks skip.
Tiny evening exercise: for toy y = [−0.2, 0.1, 0.3], compute pinball loss at τ=0.25 vs τ=0.75 for a guess ŷ=0; write why the two losses are not symmetric. Learning only.
Landing: arXiv abs
Not investment advice. This Hub note is educational only. DeepLOB-QR is academic ML research—not a recommendation to trade quantile LOB nets with real capital.
Single course CTA: SoloQuant Academy’s Introduction to Python Programming—lists and indexing first; quantile heads are just extra outputs on the same array.