Li, Laeven & Vellekoop (2018) study integrated volatility when microstructure noise is dependent—so naive high-frequency estimators misbehave. Plain-language intro. Not investment advice.
Tick data look precise until microstructure noise contaminates every print. What if that noise is not i.i.d., but dependent over time—so standard integrated-volatility recipes break?
Dependent Microstructure Noise and Integrated Volatility Estimation from High-Frequency Data (Li, Laeven, Vellekoop, 2018) studies how to think about integrated volatility when noise dependence matters.
Fit for learners: Open-PDF classic/working paper on microstructure — useful for after-work Python quant learners building intuition before coding.
This Hub note is a plain-language intro. Not investment advice.
Read theorems and simulations in the PDF. Do not turn a volatility estimator into a trading signal by default.
Evening notebooks love np.diff(log_price)**2. Microstructure papers explain why that sum can lie. Before you chain volatility features into any model, you want this vocabulary: noise, dependence, sampling frequency, integrated volatility.
Healthy practice: downsample a public tick or 1-minute series, compute realised vol at several frequencies, and plot the famous volatility signature—label “learning only.”
Landing: arXiv:1704.08964
Not investment advice. Volatility estimators are research and risk tools. They are not instructions to trade options or futures.
Single course CTA: SoloQuant Academy’s Introduction to Python Programming—arrays and plots first; high-frequency econometrics becomes readable later.