Tóth, Bouchaud and coauthors (2011) explain the empirical square-root market-impact law via latent liquidity that vanishes near the price. Plain-language intro. Not investment advice.
Large orders move prices. Empirically, impact often grows roughly like the square root of traded volume—not linearly. Why would liquidity behave that strangely near the current price?
Anomalous Price Impact and the Critical Nature of Liquidity in Financial Markets (Tóth, Lemperière, Deremble, de Lataillade, Kockelkoren, Bouchaud, 2011) offers a dynamical liquidity story: a V-shaped latent supply/demand profile that vanishes around the current price, under mild assumptions plus roughly diffusive prices.
This Hub note is a plain-language intro. Not investment advice.
Read the PDF for assumptions, numerics, and figures. Do not treat the square-root rule as a trading edge by itself.
Execution and transaction-cost intuition shows up long before you build a fancy optimizer. If your after-work path includes any portfolio or backtest code, you need a mental model for why costs are nonlinear. This paper is a classic open-PDF route into that mindset.
Healthy practice later: plot impact-vs-size on a public or simulated series and label it “learning only.”
Landing: arXiv:1105.1694
Not investment advice. Impact laws are descriptive research tools. They are not instructions to trade, size, or time orders in a live account.
Single course CTA: SoloQuant Academy’s Introduction to Python Programming—get comfortable with arrays, files, and plots first; microstructure papers become much less scary afterward.